{"id":1819,"date":"2026-08-05T01:32:36","date_gmt":"2026-08-05T00:32:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/?p=1819"},"modified":"2026-08-05T02:01:44","modified_gmt":"2026-08-05T01:01:44","slug":"tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Through the prism of Tony Blair\u2019s recent treatise, cultural critic Professor Daniel G. Williams reflects on the implications of Stephen Kinnock\u2019s appointment as Welsh Secretary of State.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Richard Wyn Jones recently noted the curious contradiction at the heart of Andy Burnham\u2019s latest constitutional appointments. At precisely the moment when a Prime Minister comes to office who accepts that devolution has become an entrenched feature of Britain&#8217;s political landscape, two longstanding sceptics of the devolution settlement &#8211; Stephen Kinnock as Secretary of State for Wales and Chris Bryant as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland &#8211; have been entrusted with the departments whose daily business is the management of Britain&#8217;s devolved constitution. The irony is difficult to miss. Both men belong to the Blairite tradition within Labour: a political culture that has often spoken the language of constitutional reform while remaining instinctively attached to the authority of the British centre.<\/p>\n<p>There is, of course, a long history of using the Welsh Office\u2014and later the Wales Office\u2014as a means of balancing internal party factions. Margaret Thatcher entrusted it to One Nation Conservatives such as Peter Walker; Tony Blair used it to promote the more radical constitutional vision of Ron Davies. But Kinnock&#8217;s appointment comes at a rather different moment. It arrives not at the high tide of Blairism, when its confidence in Britain&#8217;s capacity for self-renewal appeared justified, but after the assumptions on which that project rested have come under sustained pressure from financial crisis, Brexit, constitutional fragmentation, ecological emergency and, most recently, the profound moral crisis exposed by Gaza. Blair&#8217;s recent essay on the future of Britain therefore deserves attention not because it offers a convincing route forward, but because it lays bare, perhaps more clearly than any defence mounted by his critics, the intellectual assumptions that continue to shape this wing of the Labour Party. To understand what Kinnock and Bryant represent constitutionally, it is worth returning to Blair himself.<\/p>\n<p>It is worth returning to Tony Blair\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/institute.global\/insights\/politics-and-governance\/the-labour-party-is-playing-with-fire-over-its-future-and-the-future-of-the-country\">recent essay<\/a> within this context. It was largely interpreted through the familiar coordinates of Westminster commentary: a rebuke to Keir Starmer, a defence of New Labour modernisation, and an attempt to reclaim the \u201cradical centre\u201d from both Labour statism and right-populist insurgency. Read this way, the piece appeared as another episode in the interminable argument over Labour\u2019s future. But this framing misses what was most revealing about the essay. Blair\u2019s intervention matters less for what it says about Labour than for what it discloses about the exhaustion of the British political imagination itself.<\/p>\n<p>For Blair\u2019s essay is haunted by a contradiction reflected in the world views of Kinnock and Bryant and offers the clearest statement of its surviving intellectual grammar. It presents itself as anti-nostalgic, future-oriented and technologically alert. Artificial intelligence, geopolitical realignment, the rise of China and India, the fragmentation of media, the collapse of traditional party structures: these form the explicit terrain of the argument. Blair repeatedly insists that politics must adapt to a transformed world. Yet the political form through which he imagines this adaptation remains strikingly old. Beneath the rhetoric of innovation lies a familiar fantasy: Britain as a coherent strategic actor, capable of renewal from the centre through managerial competence, Atlantic alliances, economic growth and technocratic state reform.<\/p>\n<p>That Blair ignores Welsh and Scottish nationalism is symptomatic of what his world-view occludes. He, and much of the English metropolitan press, continue to think in terms of \u201cBritain\u201d itself as an unquestioned political subject capable of strategic renewal. But the centrifugal pressures within the Union are now among the defining facts of political life in these islands. Scotland has undergone a constitutional transformation over the last decade. In Wales, Labour\u2019s historical dominance has fractured. Northern Ireland increasingly operates according to a political logic that is largely incomprehensible within British frameworks. The growth of Reform might express a neo-imperial confidence in the British state, but is in fact symptomatic of a mounting distrust towards it.<\/p>\n<p>What Blair cannot fully acknowledge is that the crisis of Britain is no longer merely a crisis of policy. It is a crisis of political form.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-1821 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/OIP-197x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"151\" height=\"230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/OIP-197x300.jpg 197w, https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/OIP.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 151px) 100vw, 151px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Tom Nairn recognised this decades ago in <em>The Break-Up of Britain<\/em>. The British state, Nairn argued, survived modernity not by democratising itself but by displacing its contradictions outward through empire. The consequence was an archaic and hyper-centralised political culture incapable of generating democratic legitimacy once imperial cohesion collapsed. Blair\u2019s essay, despite all its language of dynamism and modernisation, remains trapped within precisely this post-imperial framework. The state must become more effective, more strategic, more technologically agile &#8211; but the constitutional structure of the state itself remains fundamentally unquestioned.<\/p>\n<p>Blair treats \u201cstate capacity\u201d as though it were self-evidently synonymous with democratic renewal. But capacity and legitimacy are not the same thing. A state may become more efficient while becoming less democratically meaningful. Indeed, much of the present crisis across Western democracies stems precisely from the growing gap between technocratic efficacy and democratic identification on the part of the electorate. Citizens increasingly experience politics not as collective self-government but as distant managerial administration.<\/p>\n<p>Blair sees this crisis clearly enough in symptomatic form. He recognises the collapse of trust in conventional politics. He understands that the old party structures no longer command emotional loyalty. He sees that the appeal of figures such as Donald Trump, Giorgia Meloni or Javier Milei derives partly from their apparent willingness to break institutional constraints. Yet he continues to interpret these developments primarily through the lens of governmental effectiveness. Populism emerges, in his account, because conventional politicians \u201ctotter in the breeze,\u201d unable to solve problems decisively enough.<\/p>\n<p>But the deeper issue may not be governmental weakness alone. It may be the collapse of democratic attachment to the political centre itself.<\/p>\n<p>Here, Blair\u2019s aside about the 2024 American election is revealing. \u201cIf the Democrats had chosen a strong centrist candidate,\u201d he writes, \u201cit would have been a much closer call.\u201d Yet Kamala Harris was, by any recognisable historical measure, already a centrist liberal candidate. Economically moderate, institutionally orthodox, Atlanticist in foreign policy, closely aligned with corporate America and cautious in relation to structural redistribution, Harris hardly represented the insurgent left. Blair\u2019s remark therefore raises an unavoidable question: what exactly does he mean by \u201ccentrist\u201d?<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>What is both striking and damning, however, is the near-absence of moral vocabulary when discussing Western violence itself.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The answer cannot simply be policy moderation. Rather, Blair\u2019s \u201ccentre\u201d increasingly appears as a cultural and institutional category: managerial, executive, Atlanticist, technocratic, reassuring to capital, emotionally restrained and legible to establishment power. To be ungenerous: male and white. The category presents itself as universal rationality while carrying historically specific assumptions about who appears credible within systems shaped by class hierarchy, imperial memory and elite institutional continuity. This is one reason the contemporary centre often struggles to understand its own legitimacy crisis. It mistakes establishment recognisability for political universality.<\/p>\n<p>Nowhere is this moral exhaustion clearer than in Blair\u2019s treatment of foreign policy. Throughout the essay, the language of realism, strategic necessity and alliance management predominates. Britain must remain close to the United States. It must preserve NATO cohesion. It must behave as a responsible middle power within an unstable geopolitical order. Even Donald Trump\u2019s coercive nationalism is interpreted less as rupture than as \u201creckoning.\u201d The emphasis falls constantly on power and positioning.<\/p>\n<p>What is both striking and damning, however, is the near-absence of moral vocabulary when discussing Western violence itself. Gaza appears only obliquely through Blair\u2019s defence of strategic alliances and his criticism of British hesitation over American military action against Iran. Civilian devastation, humanitarian catastrophe and the erosion of international law barely register as central political questions. Here the deeper logic of Blairism becomes visible. Ethical claims remain ultimately subordinate to geopolitical alignment and state functionality.<\/p>\n<p>This moral narrowing is one reason younger generations increasingly distrust the liberal centre. Humanitarian principles appear selectively applied according to strategic convenience. The language of universal values survives rhetorically while operating within highly unequal structures of global power. The moral contradictions first exposed by Iraq reach their terminal form in Gaza, where Blairism\u2019s language of humanitarian intervention and liberal internationalism collapses into open apologetics for Western power.<\/p>\n<p>There is a parallel contradiction in Blair\u2019s domestic economics. Again and again in his essay, he treats economic growth as logically prior to social justice: growth first, redistribution later. This was the foundational assumption of New Labour. Market dynamism would generate the wealth through which social inclusion could be funded. Yet after financial crisis, austerity, Brexit, ecological breakdown, deindustrialisation, regional collapse and the housing crisis, fewer and fewer people believe growth automatically produces democratic legitimacy or moral cohesion.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>Welsh and Scottish civic nationalism, at their most intellectually serious represent attempts to imagine post-imperial democratic forms adequate to multinational, ecologically fragile and economically unequal societies.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>A contemporary critique mounted from a perspective made possible by Plaid Cymru\u2019s emergence in Government would therefore insist that the question is no longer simply whether Britain generates enough growth. The deeper question concerns control: who controls wealth, infrastructure, housing, energy, land and democratic power itself? Blair\u2019s essay remains curiously silent on ownership. It celebrates markets, entrepreneurs, technological transformation and competitiveness while largely bypassing the structural concentration of economic power that has accompanied neoliberal globalisation.<\/p>\n<p>This silence becomes particularly acute around ecology. Blair effectively dismisses strong climate commitments on the grounds that Britain\u2019s emissions are comparatively small and that energy competitiveness must take priority. But this argument, universalised, becomes catastrophic. Every nation can claim its emissions are proportionally limited. Climate politics only functions through cumulative international responsibility. The logic Blair deploys here is precisely the logic that makes collective ecological action impossible: each state exempting itself in the name of realism while the aggregate result becomes planetary destruction.<\/p>\n<p>What emerges instead from the \u201cperipheries\u201d Blair neglects is not a retreat from modernity but the outline of a different modernity altogether. Welsh and Scottish civic nationalism, at their most intellectually serious, are not simply arguments for administrative devolution or cultural recognition. They represent attempts to imagine post-imperial democratic forms adequate to multinational, ecologically fragile and economically unequal societies. Their importance lies precisely in their distance from the exhausted assumptions of British state centralism.<\/p>\n<p>This is why Plaid Cymru\u2019s politics matters beyond Wales itself. Within Westminster discourse, Welsh politics is often treated as marginal, provincial or secondary to the supposedly \u201creal\u201d politics of Britain. But it may be precisely at the edges of the British state that emergent democratic forms are becoming visible first. Wales increasingly articulates a politics less attached to military prestige, less invested in imperial nostalgia, more committed to social welfare, more sceptical of Atlanticist orthodoxy and more open to forms of European cooperation that are not reducible to market integration alone.<\/p>\n<p>Blair still imagines Europe primarily through the framework of strategic competitiveness and economic alignment. But a post-sovereign Europeanism means something different from the perspective of smaller nations. It means cooperation without imperial hierarchy; democratic interdependence rather than centralised sovereignty; social solidarity beyond the nation-state. The question is not how Britain re-enters Europe as a restored middle power. It is whether democratic legitimacy in these islands now depends precisely upon loosening the constitutional and ideological grip of the British centre itself.<\/p>\n<p>This is the deeper political divide Blair\u2019s essay inadvertently exposes. His central question remains: how can Britain recover efficacy within a transformed global order? But for many in Wales and Scotland, the more urgent question has become: what political forms are capable not merely of generating growth or projecting power, but of sustaining democratic legitimacy, alleviating poverty, embedding ecological responsibility and placing humanitarian principle at the centre of foreign policy within a post-imperial archipelago? The appointments of Stephen Kinnock and Chris Bryant to the Wales and Northern Ireland briefs indicate that this tension remains significant, for despite Burnham\u2019s warm words, it exposes the neo-imperial constitutional imagination that seemingly continues to inform Labour&#8217;s understanding of the multinational state.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Through the prism of Tony Blair\u2019s recent treatise, cultural critic Professor Daniel G. Williams reflects on the implications of Stephen Kinnock\u2019s appointment as Welsh Secretary of State. Richard Wyn Jones &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":1820,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-heb-gategori","entry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Through the prism of Tony Blair\u2019s recent treatise, cultural critic Professor Daniel G. Williams reflects on the implications of Stephen Kinnock\u2019s appointment as Welsh Secretary of State. Richard Wyn Jones &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"undod\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/undodcymru\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"806\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"642\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Williams\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@undodcymru\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@undodcymru\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Williams\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Williams\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/903e732917af212586ea576b7ef4bea2\"},\"headline\":\"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4401,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg\",\"width\":806,\"height\":642},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/05\\\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tu Hwnt i Blair: Cymru ac Argyfwng y Wladwriaeth Brydeinig\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"undod\",\"description\":\"Radical Independence for Wales\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"undod\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/cropped-Undod-Eicon.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/07\\\/cropped-Undod-Eicon.png\",\"width\":190,\"height\":190,\"caption\":\"undod\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/undodcymru\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/undodcymru\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/undodcymru\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UC2p51r8PTDxeVjMyjB0FViw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/903e732917af212586ea576b7ef4bea2\",\"name\":\"Daniel Williams\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daniel Williams\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/undod.cymru\\\/en\\\/author\\\/daniel-williams\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod","og_description":"Through the prism of Tony Blair\u2019s recent treatise, cultural critic Professor Daniel G. Williams reflects on the implications of Stephen Kinnock\u2019s appointment as Welsh Secretary of State. Richard Wyn Jones &hellip; Continue reading \"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State\"","og_url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/","og_site_name":"undod","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/undodcymru","article_published_time":"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":806,"height":642,"url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Daniel Williams","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@undodcymru","twitter_site":"@undodcymru","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daniel Williams","Estimated reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Williams","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/903e732917af212586ea576b7ef4bea2"},"headline":"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State","datePublished":"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/"},"wordCount":4401,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg","inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/","url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/","name":"Beyond Blairism: Wales and the Crisis of the British State - undod","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-05T00:32:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-05T01:01:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Neil_Kinnock_and_Tony_Blair_3-e1785890315385.jpg","width":806,"height":642},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/2026\/08\/05\/tu-hwnt-i-blair-cymru-ac-argyfwng-y-wladwriaeth-brydeinig\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tu Hwnt i Blair: Cymru ac Argyfwng y Wladwriaeth Brydeinig"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/","name":"undod","description":"Radical Independence for Wales","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#organization","name":"undod","url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-Undod-Eicon.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-Undod-Eicon.png","width":190,"height":190,"caption":"undod"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/undodcymru","https:\/\/x.com\/undodcymru","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/undodcymru\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2p51r8PTDxeVjMyjB0FViw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/903e732917af212586ea576b7ef4bea2","name":"Daniel Williams","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/853f3f6b9a5e85ece99c11b7eb4c3bb9ca650347f4d46727777bf6e9658ee4e4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daniel Williams"},"url":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/author\/daniel-williams\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1819"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1826,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions\/1826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/undod.cymru\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}